Not since 2002, when I read Teaching as a Subversive Activity, have I sat down to read another book be Neil Postman. I can't explain such neglect on my part. But, as with Illich I want the people in my network to explain why we are not referring to Postman more? His 1992 book, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology for example. I know Shirky and Wesch both mention Postman by name at least, and maybe i just miss other references. Certainly i seem to be more impressionable, but it seems to me that the points made in this book are very important to our discourse, and missing.
I'm sitting in the sun at South Bank Brisbane, waiting to join the Wikipedia Brisbane meetup. I've just finished the introduction to Technopoly...
Function follows form. P7
New things change old words. P8
Undeserved authority. P9
Private matters made known to powerful institutions. P10
Technologies change the way we think and feel. Ideologically. P12
On assigning marks for student work as a strange conception and Techno implementation. P13
The unforeseen consequences. The clock for God, but serving Mammon. P15
On computers in classrooms. The balance between orality and text is tipping to text. P17
Technology as ecological. P18